Friday, December 2, 2011

Teaching Observations/Evaluations

Teaching Observations/Evaluations

Candidates will be observed and evaluated regularly throughout senior block by the content methods professor and the mentor teacher. Individual lesson evaluations will be shared with the candidate by the methods professor and the mentor teacher and weekly evaluations will also be shared. The primary evaluation of candidate’s classroom teaching will be a part of the content methods course.

Additionally, a content professor (English Dept) will be asked to evaluate each candidate at least once during senior block for content knowledge. This evaluation should be arranged by the candidate with a content professor of the candidate’s choosing.

Planning and Assessment Portfolio

Planning and Assessment Portfolio

Candidates must prepare all aspects of daily planning throughout the senior block; these plans, materials, and assessments must be available before each lesson. Any materials that cannot be shared electronically may be maintained in hard-copy format in a notebook and arranged at the discretion of the candidate and submitted at the end of senior block.

Your plans should fulfill the following requirements:

• The instructional plan provides connections to the discipline; addresses curriculum standards; includes concepts that students have difficulty grasping; and has potential for engaging students. Be sure to designate both SC state Standards and NCTE Standards addressed in each lesson.

• The instructional plan identifies some objectives – (behavioral and specific to performance) that document the task that students are expected to perform in order to demonstrate understanding. You may state your objectives as statements of questions, and you should address cognitive, affective, and psycho-motor objectives as appropriate.

• The instructional plan includes some of the facts, concepts, and strategies that the students need to perform effectively and achieve the desired results; some activities that will equip students with the needed knowledge and strategies; implicit statements about the methodology and technology to teach and/or model what needs to be taught; and the materials and resources needed to accomplish these goals.

• The instructional plan includes some assessments needed to document that the students have attained the desired understandings and therefore validate that the essential learning has been achieved.  The final performance task or project is likely to provide some evidence that the students are able to use their knowledge in context. You should coordinate your assessments with the objectives and standards identified in your plans. You should also identify ways in which your assessments (formative and summative) help inform your future plans. As well, you should demonstrate a variety of assessment formats throughout your placement.

• You are required to address the NCTE 2012 standards listed below in your plans throughout your placement. Please be sure to prepare lessons that require students to consider their own cultures and other cultures; to read and respond to literature from women and people of color; to connect their experiences in ELA coursework with the world outside of school; to experience interdisciplinary lessons; to gain respect for, and support of, individual differences of ethnicity, race, language, culture, gender, and ability; to explore oral, written, and visual literacy; to learn while engaged with appropriate technologies; and to have personal responses to texts.

NCTE 2012 Standards

CP III.E1
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates use their knowledge of theory, research, and practice in English Language Arts to plan standards- based, coherent and relevant learning experiences utilizing a range of different texts—across genres, periods, forms, authors, cultures, and various forms of media—and instructional strategies that are motivating and accessible to all students, including English language learners, students with special needs, students from diverse language and learning backgrounds, those designated as high achieving, and those at risk of failure.
CP III.E2
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates design a range of authentic assessments (e.g., formal and informal, formative and summative) of reading and literature that demonstrate an understanding of how learners develop and that address interpretive, critical, and evaluative abilities in reading, writing, speaking, listening, viewing, and presenting.
CP III.E3
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates plan standards-based, coherent and relevant learning experiences in reading that reflect knowledge of current theory and research about the teaching and learning of reading and that utilize individual and collaborative approaches and a variety of reading strategies.
CP III.E4
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates design or knowledgeably select appropriate reading assessments that inform instruction by providing data about student interests, reading proficiencies, and reading processes.
CP III.E5
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates plan instruction that incorporates knowledge of language—structure, history, and conventions—to facilitate students’ comprehension and interpretation of print and non-print texts.
CP III.E6
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for reading and the study of literature to promote learning for all students.
Candidates plan instruction which, when appropriate, reflects curriculum integration and incorporates interdisciplinary teaching methods and materials.
CP IV.E1
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for composing texts (i.e., oral, written, and visual) to promote learning for all students.
Candidates use their knowledge of theory, research, and practice in English Language Arts to plan standards- based, coherent and relevant composing experiences that utilize individual and collaborative approaches and contemporary technologies and reflect an understanding of writing processes and strategies in different genres for a variety of purposes and audiences.
CP IV.E2
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for composing texts (i.e., oral, written, and visual) to promote learning for all students.
Candidates design a range of assessments for students that promote their development as writers, are appropriate to the writing task, and are consistent with current research and theory. Candidates are able to respond to student writing in process and to finished texts in ways that engage students’ ideas and encourage their growth as writers over time.
CP IV.E3
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for composing texts (i.e., oral, written, and visual) to promote learning for all students.
Candidates design instruction related to the strategic use of language conventions (grammar, usage, and mechanics) in the context of students’ writing for different audiences, purposes, and modalities.
CP IV.E4
Candidates plan instruction and design assessments for composing texts (i.e., oral, written, and visual) to promote learning for all students.
Candidates design instruction that incorporates students’ home and community languages to enable skillful control over their rhetorical choices and language practices for a variety of audiences and purposes.
LL V.E1
Candidates plan, implement, assess, and reflect on research-based instruction that increases motivation and active student engagement, builds sustained learning of English language arts, and responds to diverse students’ context-based needs.
Candidates plan and implement instruction based on ELA curricular requirements and standards, school and community contexts, and knowledge about students’ linguistic and cultural backgrounds. 

* Your unit/lesson planning should be guided by the parameters for an instructional unit as explained in Smagorinsky, P. (2008). Teaching English by design. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Examples available on-line: http://www.coe.uga.edu/~smago/VirtualLibrary/index.html

Text Reading/Reaction Logs

Text Reading/Reaction Logs

Read the assigned texts and maintain a reading log throughout your readings.  I highly recommend that you include in the log any notes on how the text reading offers practical information you can apply in the classroom; also, I recommend that you maintain a double-entry format—with your reading notes on the left of each page and a blank space to the right so you can jot relevant reactions and experiences during your in-class experience over the spring term.

Conference Presentation

Conference Presentation (7) EDU 452

Candidates submit a conference presentation to a local (Greenville County Teachers of English), state (South Carolina Council of Teachers of English), or national (National Council of Teachers of English) professional organization. Candidates prepare a multimedia (PowerPoint) presentation, including high quality research properly cited and incorporated. Candidates attend and, if accepted, present at designated conference. Candidates should target proficiencies noted below (see rubric), notably collaborating with another (other) candidate(s) or professor and addressing student needs appropriate for the community being served.

PKS VII.E1
Candidates are prepared to interact knowledgeably with students, families, and colleagues based on social needs and institutional roles, engage in leadership and/or collaborative roles in English Language Arts professional learning communities, and actively develop as professional educators.
Candidates model literate and ethical practices in ELA teaching, and engage in/reflect on a variety of experiences related to ELA.

Conference Presentation (7)
EDU 452
PKS VII.E2
Candidates are prepared to interact knowledgeably with students, families, and colleagues based on social needs and institutional roles, engage in leadership and/or collaborative roles in English Language Arts professional learning communities, and actively develop as professional educators.
Candidates engage in and reflect on a variety of experiences related to ELA that demonstrate understanding of and readiness for leadership, collaboration, ongoing professional development, and community engagement.

Conference Presentation (7)
EDU 452
Professionalism
Candidates attend and, if accepted, present at designated conference. Candidates should target proficiencies noted below (see rubric), notably collaborating with another (other) candidate(s) or professor and addressing student needs appropriate for the community being served.

EDU 452



Secondary Schedules: Spring Term 2012


Linguistics and Literacy Portfolio

Linguistics and Literacy Portfolio (6) EDU 452

Candidates organize and create a portfolio of artifacts (essays, assignments) that demonstrate the linguistics and literacy content knowledge identified below (see rubric). These artifacts should be drawn from English major coursework as well as any relevant courses in the candidate’s program of study; additionally, candidates will draft and submit original work as determined by conferencing with the professor—notably to address proficiency in APA citations, public writing, and communication in online/virtual contexts that incorporate the use of traditional texts, hyperlink citations, images, and/or video. This portfolio must include an original reflection addressing how the artifacts demonstrate candidate proficiency in the content knowledge detailed below (see rubric).

CK I.E1
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of English language arts subject matter content that specifically includes literature and multimedia texts as well as knowledge of the nature of adolescents as readers.
Candidates are knowledgeable about texts—print and non-print texts, media texts, classic texts and contemporary texts, including young adult—that represent a range of world literatures, historical traditions, genres, and the experiences of different genders, ethnicities, and social classes; they are able to use literary theories to interpret and critique a range of texts.
Linguistics and Literacy Portfolio (6)
EDU 452
CK II.E1
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of English language arts subject matter content that specifically includes language and writing as well as knowledge of adolescents as language users.
Candidates compose a range of formal and informal texts taking into consideration the interrelationships among form, audience, context, and purpose; candidates understand that writing is a recursive process; candidates use contemporary technologies and/or digital media to compose multimodal discourse.
Linguistics and Literacy Portfolio (6)
EDU 452
CK II.E2
Candidates demonstrate knowledge of English language arts subject matter  that specifically includes language and writing as well as knowledge of adolescents as language users.
Candidates know the conventions of English language as they relate to various rhetorical situations (grammar, usage, and mechanics); they understand the concept of dialect and are familiar with relevant grammar systems (e.g., descriptive and prescriptive); they understand principles of language acquisition; they recognize the influence of English language history on ELA content; and they understand the impact of language on society.
 Linguistics and Literacy Portfolio (6)
EDU 452
Citation and scholarship
Candidates include artifacts that demonstrate proficiency in citation formats (MLA, APA) appropriate to the disciplines of English and education as well as a broad range of writing genres, media, modes, and purposes in writing/ communication. Artifacts demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of selecting and incorporating high quality sources in scholarly and public communication.

EDU 452